Crabby Blogging Lady

I cannot STAND that lady! She’s like the spawn of Damien! This woman lies even when she doesn’t have to! She’s just so wicked. She thoroughly fulfills what C.S. Lewis once said:

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

While the rest of the world in wrapped up in dumb ol’ World Cup stuff and personalized soccer balls, Hillary and cohorts are denying us our rights as American citizens under the LAW!

President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy. And the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act. But the more important commitment that President Obama has made is to try to introduce and pass comprehensive immigration reform. That is what we need. Everyone knows it, and the President is committed to doing it.

WHOA WHOA WHOA. “the federal government should be determining immigration policy”????? HELLOOOOOOOO! It already did!! There are LAWS on the books! The “policy” isn’t the whims of whoever stands in front of the presidential podium, hello!!! The federal government policy is to ENFORCE THE LAW! And the law says we have BORDERS. And that our borders are to be DEFENDED.

The feds have no right to sue Arizona. Instead of enforcing the law and chasing out the Mexican ruffians, the feds are going after the states, the cannibals! We don’t need no stinkin’ “reform.” We want the LAW ENFORCED that protects US, not THEM.

Comprende?!

All the hooplah has died down about Obamacare, but I’m still PRETTY steamed about it. I find it unconscionable that Americans will be forced to pay for that crap. AND if we don’t, be fined to the gills, sicced on by the IRS, or thrown in prison.

It’s unconscionable!!!!

Then there’s this– some groups are claiming exemption because of their faith, such as the Amish. I think that’s great– hey I would be a conscientious objector, right!

Wrong.

The recent health-care reform legislation carries a controversial mandate that all Americans obtain health insurance, but careful study of the passed law reveals there are some groups – the Amish, for example – that can obtain an exemption.

For devout Muslims, however, whose religious beliefs forbid purchasing insurance, the mandate is still binding, religion or not. And most other religious, political or conscientious objectors will similarly find themselves out of luck if they hope to be excused from the requirement.

There is a clause in the fine print, however, that could provide an out for those willing to take it.

Section 1501 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act adds a new chapter to the Internal Revenue Code mandating all “applicable” individuals either obtain health insurance that meets the bill’s “minimum essential coverage” standards or pay a penalty on tax day.

Those wicked politicians are using the income tax as a way to control us. The power to tax is the power to destroy and all that.

*sigh*

My faith isn’t against caring for my health. Like DUH. But it IS against having the government care for it!!

I don’t understand why more people aren’t screaming against this. Maybe they are lulled into believing that they will get free stuff and still be able to live a comfortable lifestyle (because other people are paying for it) and make their own health care decisions (not!). You think the politicians are going to let you keep sucking on those electronic cigarettes and eating eclairs all day???? NOT! Wake up, folks! The whole thing is incredibly insane.

This is just sick. Makes me sick! Read this article. Tell me if that phrase “government’s role in health care” gives you the shivers like it gives me the shivers.

Senate Panel Previews Electronic Health Technology

The Senate Committee on Aging last week offered a preview of the government’s future role in health care, showing how Americans will interact with doctors and other health care providers. The demonstration offers a glimpse at an overlooked effect of health care reform.

The effort, loosely called e-Health or e-Care, combines health-care technology with 21st-century Internet connectivity. It will allow doctors to interact with their patients through innovations such as video chats, telephone health checkups, and home-health monitoring devices that relay data over wireless Internet connections.

Home-health monitoring devices? Hey, I like the Internet…. it’s a great place to get information on best term life insurance quotes or whatever. But I want to be in control of me, ok?

“The development of the broadband network and health information technologies has the potential to truly transform health care and simultaneously enable better outcomes and lowering costs,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine).

One of the new health technologies on display last Thursday was an automatic drug dispenser that can monitor and adjust medication dosages wirelessly, allowing doctors to tailor dosages of drugs such as insulin without having to schedule in-person visits with patients.

“What we’re talking about, folks, is using a device like this one,” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said, as he displayed the small device. “It attaches to the patient’s skin and is loaded with drugs that are administered in the exact way that the doctor prescribes – wirelessly.

“That means that a doctor can vary the doses based on the information the doctor is receiving [from the monitor]. The patient doesn’t have to go in to the doctor and then the pharmacy to change his or her prescription,” he said.

So is this the reason for the government mandate to get everyone connected with broadband??

Am I the only one really creeped out about this? The government is forcing us to have their health “care.” Then they force us to get rigged to the computers, to have drugs or whatever dispensed by SOMEONE ELSE through a WIRELESS connection. This is INSANE.

These senators act like they have a bunch of new toys to play with. Us.

What the heck ever happened to getting the government out of our bodies, huh???????? Where’s Betty Friedan and Jane Fonda now?!

Good video. It’s Ron Paul’s take on the catastrophe that the Washingtonians are creating for us.

You know, I have a question about this kind of stuff–of seeing Ron Paul get on news programs EVERYWHERE as news stations breathlessly ask his opinion about the latest idiotic drivel from the government:

WHERE THE H*LL WERE THESE PEOPLE DURING THE 2009 ELECTIONS?!? Why are they all suddenly SOOOOOO interested in what Ron Paul thinks about things? Why didn’t they vote for him back then?! We could have avoided all this crap and be free people if they had heeded Paul back then!

Anyway, while Nancy Pelosi is “creating jobs” by hiring scads more chefs, waiters, staffers, and stocking her cushy office with modern furniture, we Americans are awaiting the Gestapo to invade our homes, kill our leaders, and convert us to socialism. Cuz did you hear what Paul said? Did anyone hear it?

Any time a government tries to give you a service or something of substance, they have to steal it from somebody else. So the whole process is immoral, because it’s based on government theft. That’s why they’re hiring 16,000 more new IRS agents, because they have to steal more money.

OK OK I know I have had an avalanche of posts about politics. I promise I’ll stop (soon). It’s all just so upsetting. We can’t drift back into our mediocre lives while these knuckleheads enslave us under our noses. We must keep the angry fires burning!

But I’ll write some happy crabby posts in the near future. As soon as I get this crap out of my system.

Haha. That Lawrence Katz can be SO funny! Too bad nobody listens to him.

“I just think it’s a silly exercise” counting jobs, Katz said.

The numbers are inherently inaccurate, he said, because we’ll never know how many jobs would have been created or lost without the stimulus. To do so, we’d need a control group, say giving stimulus money to North Carolina but withholding it from South Carolina.

“Obviously, that’s not something we can do,” Katz said. “We’ve only got one draw of history.”

That’s an “old” quote (January of this year).

I agree! Trying to count how many jobs have been “saved” or even “created” is SUCH a silly exercise! So why is government insisting that doing this and that “saves” and “creates” jobs? If it was truly SO silly, wouldn’t you guys all quit talking about it? What I understand is– you government control freaks throw around the term “create jobs” when it’s convenient to SELL and MARKET an agenda you have, but when we look around for evidence (since we do, after all, PAY for all this “job creation”), it’s suddenly SILLY! Ha hah hah! Funny, guys!

“Now, if you hear some of the critics, they’ll say, well, the Recovery Act, I don’t know if that’s really worked, because we still have high unemployment,” the president said in Nashua, NH on February 2, 2010. “But what they fail to understand is that every economist, from the left and the right, has said, because of the Recovery Act, we’ve started to see at least a couple of million jobs that have either been created or would have been lost.”

Oh yeah? Then how do you explain this stuff?

Personal Income Drops Across the Country

Personal income in 42 states fell in 2009, the Commerce Department said Thursday. Nevada’s 4.8% plunge was the steepest, as construction and tourism industries took a beating. Also hit hard: Wyoming, where incomes fell 3.9%.

Incomes stayed flat in two states and rose in six and the District of Columbia. West Virginia had the best showing with a 2.1% increase. In Maine, Kentucky and Hawaii, increased government benefits, such as unemployment insurance and Social Security, offset drops in earnings and property values.

These people are JOKES. They’ll sell their souls for a dollar, and then try to sell ours from under us, too. This isn’t a GAME, you Washington degenerates. The people of the United States are not a Nintendo Wii game, you jerks. You want to toodle around with quack policies and goofy socialist-style experiments? You wanna wreck your life? Go ahead, whatever. But LEAVE ME ALONE! I thought this was supposed to be the land of the free!

Skip that Remember the Maine and Remember Pearl Harbor stuff– we have a war raging right here in our own federal capitol. Remember March 21, 2010! The day the republic died! The day that Congress said that THEY could manage our health and health care better than we can!

I wonder– I really do– if Americans will remember this, come November elections. Americans have such disgustingly short attention spans. All it takes is a sports game or a porn star’s death or a celebrity scandal to wipe out all common sense, decency, and memory from Americans’ minds.

All except ME, of course.

I saw this at Rasmussen.

Fifty percent (50%) of U.S. voters say they are less likely to vote for their representative in Congress this November if he or she votes for the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey taken Wednesday night finds that 34% are more likely to vote for their Congress member’s reelection if he or she supports the president’s health care plan. Eight percent (8%) say the health care vote will have no impact on how they vote this November, and another seven percent (7%) are not sure.

Thirty-three percent (33%) of all voters favor the creation of a single-payer health care system where the federal government provides coverage for everyone. Fifty-four percent (54%) oppose such a system. These findings are unchanged from the end of last year. Support for a single-payer system plays a huge role in whether someone will support a Representative who votes for the health care plan.

54% opposed the health “care” “reform” bill?! 33% approve?! I guess Americans are not as polarized as the media depicts us, eh?

By the way, where the heck is the other 13%? Too busy watching basketball to be concerned? Maybe as soon as you realized that you can’t get your fancy hgh releasers or nasal spray without government endorsement and approval, you’ll change your mind fast.

*sigh*

I’m really not crabby about all this… I’m depressed.