May 11 2010
Oh gee. And I thought the resemblance was only behavioral. But now that I think about it…

Neanderthals mated with some modern humans after all and left their imprint in the human genome, a team of biologists has reported in the first detailed analysis of the Neanderthal genetic sequence.
The biologists, led by Svante Paabo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, have been slowly reconstructing the genome of Neanderthals, the stocky hunters that dominated Europe until 30,000 years ago, by extracting the fragments of DNA that still exist in their fossil bones. Just last year, when the biologists first announced that they had decoded the Neanderthal genome, they reported no significant evidence of interbreeding.
Scientists say they have recovered 60 percent of the genome so far and hope to complete it. By comparing that genome with those of various present day humans, the team concluded that about 1 percent to 4 percent of the genome of non-Africans today is derived from Neanderthals. But the Neanderthal DNA does not seem to have played a great role in human evolution, they said.
Yeah, bright guy. That’s because there WAS no evolution. It’s all a fairy tale. There’s no evidence for it. Period. The best thing they have is finch beaks, and there ain’t no new species popping out of those birds when the beaks get bigger or smaller during good times and bad– despite Steven Jay Gould’s ridiculous proposal of “spontaneous generation.” I found this great outline of what evolutionists believe:
According to the Darwinian religious beliefs, life began in this way:
(1) There was exactly the right atmosphere—and it was completely different from the one present today.
(2) The ground, water, or ocean where life began had exactly the right combination of chemicals—which are not present today.
(3) Using an unknown source of exactly the right amount of an unknown energy, rightward amino acids formed in sufficient quantities so that …
(4) … they could intelligently combine into enormous amounts of proteins and nucleotides (complex chemical compounds in exactly specific and highly intricate interdependent sequences).
(5) Then they intelligently reformed themselves into various tissues and organs inside a “simple” main organism.
(6) The organism found something to eat that didn’t kill it (this sounds silly, but this is important) and a way to intelligently transform those nutrients into sustainable and useful energy.
(7) The simple organism did some careful thinking and highly precise planning (as with all the other points, well beyond the collective intellectual abilities of even the finest human minds living or dead), and developed a nearly infinitely complex genetic code to cover hundreds of thousands of different factors.
(8) At this point, it found someone to marry, developed a perfectly functional reproductive system, and was ready to start reproducing offspring.
The last point reveals that all the previous points had to occur within the single lifetime of just one single celled organism. Since microbes and bacteria don’t live very long, this first living pioneer had to think and act lightning fast. So fast that, I’m afraid, the entire “theory” is just an impossible dream.
Nothing is said here about irreducible complexity, too, which is basically that ALL the systems of the evolved organism (digestive, cardiovascular, respiratory, immune, etc) had to suddenly spring into being and action together and concurrently, otherwise the organism could not live. Take away one of the systems (respiratory, for example) and you got no life there. The functioning organism (such as, YOU and ME) are so complex that we could not have possibly evolved from a one-celled organism into the extremely irreducibly complex being that we are. It’s IMPOSSIBLE. It’s IMPOSSIBLE mathematically, and logically. IMPOSSIBLE.
So back to Bill Maher and his crappy show broadcasting across tv stands…. he can act like a Neanderthal all he wants… devolve as just another lusty Huxley moose… but the fact is we were CREATED. You guys want to live in a fairy tale? Go right ahead. But don’t censor our speech and force US to believe that drivel.
For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom.” — Aldous Huxley, “Confessions of a Professed Atheist,” Report: Perspective on the News, Vol. 3, June, 1966, p.19.